Curriculum Reflection: Targeting Maths

As the year is drawing to a close, I wanted to reflect on some of the resources that we used this year and to jot down my thoughts on each of them. I thought I’d start with our maths curriculum since it has been the most consistently used resource for our first year.

This year we have worked through Targeting Maths 1. We started it after realising that preschool maths books were way too easy and boring for our son. He was almost 4 at the time. I chose Targeting Maths simply because it was in a local bookshop and I could flick through the various options to choose which level I thought best suited him. It was a good fit.

Being so young, I was trying to focus more on the daily habit of maths work rather than the content learned. Targeting Maths was good for this because the pages are bright and colourful, and fairly quick to complete. Most of the concepts he either knew or could learn quickly. There were a few that were too difficult for him and, at this point, we just moved on. It is fairly repetitive (maybe this is just the nature of year 1 maths) and, in contrast to some other year 1 curriculums that I have since looked at, fairly simple.

I have mixed feelings about the way maths curriculums move between topics with such frequency. Oftentimes a new topic was only covered for one or two pages. On one hand, it is good to keep reviewing previously learned skills, and certainly it was encouraging for him to keep returning to and improving on his new skills. On the other hand, it is easy to skim over a topic without fully understanding it. This year, as I said, we just kept going without stressing mastery, but in future years I would prefer to spend a little more time solidifying new skills before moving on.

For this year, Targeting Maths was a good fit. It was simple and colourful. My son did indeed get into the habit of doing a page or two of maths during tablework. He learnt new skills and become more confident and competent with his maths knowledge and thinking. If you want an easy to use, tick-a-box curriculum that builds a foundational mathematical ability then this would be perfect.

Next year, instead of moving him up to Targeting Maths 2 we are going to redo first grade maths using a more comprehensive and thorough curriculum. We are also hoping that this will dovetail nicely with the Beast Academy curriculum which begins at 2nd grade. I have heard wonderful things about Beast Academy but think our son needs another year (or two) before he will be ready for it. I really enjoy maths (don’t hate me!) and want my boys to truly understand and appreciate the beauty of the world of numbers and logic. Beast Academy seems to focus on the how and why of maths, not just the basic skills needed to pass the subject. Targeting Maths has been great for this first year, but I want something deeper for the future. Next year, then, we will be using Pr1me Mathematics 1, which is an Australian curriculum based upon the Singapore method. We will also continue to play lots of games and learn through life in general.

7 thoughts on “Curriculum Reflection: Targeting Maths

  1. Hi Shelley, just wonder where you can get Pr1me mathematics 1 for home use? On their official website, there is no purchase option. Thanks, Lee


      1. Thanks, Shelley. Does it also give you access to interactive online version too?

        By the way, thank you so much for writing these articles on your blog, it’s very helpful.


  2. Hi Shelley,
    Thank you for your article. I have just moved my older son onto Beast Academy, which he is loving and am looking at what to use for my other boy in grade 1. Being a year since beginning the Pr1me curriculum I was wondering if it lived up to your expectations and if you have any recommendations in the delivery.


    1. Hi Nicole, we have just started Beast Academy now too. As far as Pr1me I mostly liked it. For the most part he already knew the concepts and so the book was mostly for practice. We didn’t go through all the alternative methods for adding/subtracting because he was doing well at figuring those out for himself intuitively. We also didn’t cover every topic. It was harder than Targeting Maths at the same level which was what I wanted.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s